• Facebook Clean Grey
  • Instagram Clean Grey
  • Tumblr Clean Grey
Have tea with me

Aristotle at Afternoon Tea participates in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn commissions by linking to Amazon. This means that whenever you buy a book on Amazon from a link on here, I get a small percentage of its price. That helps support my writing in a small way, so thank you. Happy reading!

© 2014-2018 Yara Zgheib All Rights Reserved


These essays are a work of love; they are and will always be free.

However, if you would like to like to show your appreciation and support, you can do so with a monthly donation of the amount of your choice:

  • $3     A cup of tea

  • $5     Tea and a scone

  • $10   A good book

  • $25   A charming little                   dinner

  • $40   White roses and                     red wine

You may also make a one time donation of the amount of your choice:

Your donation will help me keep doing what I love. Thank you very much.

To cancel a recurring payment, simply

On a Little Prince

April 9, 2015

Of all the infinite possible ways of categorizing the people of this world, I have always found those conventionally adopted unimaginative and odd. Surely gender, age, height, and weight are not more descriptive of a person than their favorite smell, the sound of their voice, the side of the bed they sleep on, the lumps of sugar in their tea? So I developed a method of my own: I categorize people by storm names.


There are those who believe that storms are named after heartbreak: each storm is a lover lost, abandoned, a lover who has left. They are those who look at sea foam and see Hans Christian Anderson’s little mermaid, who died for love and turned into soft white bubbles floating on the surface of the sea.


Let us call them romantics.


Then there are those who read in some scholarly publication that storms are given names to make them easier for sailors to distinguish; an alphabetical list is drawn up at random by weather scientists each year. They are also those for whom sea foam is but decaying algal blooms, dissolved organic matter that the agitation of the wind and waves churns up.


Let us call them realists.


Realists see the world for what it is. Romantics, for what they want it to be. The terms were used to define two opposing trends in European intellectual life in the aftermath of the Enlightenment. Cultural romanticism came first, after the Napoleonic Wars. It glorified mysticism and emotions, and saw individuals as heroes with a manifest destiny to change the world. But the failed populist revolutions of 1848 shattered those idealistic notions, and from the gritty pragmatism that remained emerged a realism that shifted the focus to more concrete subject matters. Realists saw hardship and social injustice, and their art and literature reflected it.


Not unlike children and grownups, perhaps?


Seventy-two years and three days ago, a fascinating treatise was published on these two categories of people. It sold more than 150 million copies and was translated into 260 languages and dialects. The title in English: ‘The Little Prince.’


The book tells the story of a little boy’s travels to seven asteroid planets, including Earth, and his encounters with their inhabitants. He met a king, a conceited man, a drunkard, a businessman, a lamplighter, a geographer… but also a talking fox, a wise serpent, and a rose unlike any other in the whole universe, if only for the fact that he loved her.


Grownups and children, he found, were easily distinguishable by what they saw in a particular illustration, creatively named ‘Drawing Number 1:’



Children, of course, immediately saw an elephant inside a boa constrictor. Grownups saw a bowler hat, or worse, nothing at all, even with the help of explanatory ‘Drawing Number 2:’


 'All grownups were once children, but only few of them remember it.’

- Antoine de Saint-Exupery


Romanticism is beautiful, and childhood is sweet, but sooner or later, we grow up. A sad, inevitable byproduct of knowledge and disillusion. In time and with wear, we willingly put on the blinders that make us forsake whimsy for utility, possibility for security, boa constrictors for bowler hats. In a world that runs on hard facts, realism is the only guarantee of survival.


But there is a danger in leaving those blinders on too long; eventually, we lose sight of the world beyond them. Our occupations confine us, our self-set limitations trap us. The world, as it is, makes us bitter, and we slump into passivity. We forget we could once see elephants in boa constrictors too.


Realism shrinks reality, ‘attenuates it, falsifies it; it does not take into account our basic truths and our fundamental obsessions: love, death, astonishment. It presents man in a reduced and estranged perspective. Truth is in our dreams, in the imagination.’ - Eugène Ionesco


We may have our science, our figures and our facts, but we still need our romantics. We must nurture the artists and the daydreamers, the fortune cookie readers and the wildflower pickers, the well wishers and the sunset lovers, the eternal children. As the little prince said, their ability to see beauty is utility enough.


Once upon a time, I was fortunate enough to have known and loved such a child. A real little prince who saw the world in color, and me for much more than I was. His clouds were shaped like castles, his bright turquoise tennis shoes were magic, and the last time I saw him, he was building a rainbow machine. His world may not have been real, but it is the one I prefer.


© 2014-2015 Yara Zgheib All Rights Reserved


There are two categories of people in this world: those who see it for what it is, and those who, like you little prince, will always be seven years old. Happy birthday.


Please reload

By theme
More tea?
Follow me
  • Facebook - Grey Circle
  • Tumblr - Grey Circle
  • Instagram - Grey Circle
Please reload

May 9, 2019

May 2, 2019

April 18, 2019

April 11, 2019

April 4, 2019

March 28, 2019

Please reload